Newt Gingrich Really Wants to Change Government Starting With Judiciary

Lagging in the Republican presidential race, candidate Newt Gingrich’s recent remarks about the judiciary can only be seen as a play for press.

Gingrich’s recent stump speeches include an admonition that if he was President he would “instruct the national security officials to ignore the Supreme Court on issues of national security.” His startling proposition leads inexorably to the possibility that as potential leader of the Executive branch of government he could also decide to ignore the Legislative branch, a step that would surely lead to anarchy.

Gingrich focuses on several recent court cases including the California court’s decision to overturn the results of Proposition 8, the “definition of marriage” referendum wherein eight million Californians voted against same-sex marriage.

He also highlights the “prayer” decision of federal Judge Biery of Texas who blocked a prayer at Medina Valley High School graduation ceremonies. Judge Biery cited a shopping list of court decisions that struck down religious activities, like prayer, for breaching the First Amendment which promises freedom of religion, speech, the press and the right to lawful assembly.

Judge Biery’s four-page Reasons include orders striking the words “Invocation” and “Benediction” from the ceremony program, to be replaced by “Opening Remarks” and “Closing Remarks”. Besides banning the prayer, the Court ruled that the words “prayer” and “amen” could not be mentioned, although a speaker could state his or her own personal beliefs so long as they were not proselytizing.

A higher Court overturned this decision, a perfect illustration of how the judicial branch operates.

On a recent “Face the Nation” appearance, Gingrich suggested that federal judges be subpoenaed to explain their decisions and remarked that subpoenas may have a “sobering effect on judges’ assessment of their powers”. To suggest that the United States abandon the rule of law and the independence of its judiciary is to turn judges into “puppets” of the government, joining countries like Russia, Iran and others whose systems of justice are rife with corruption.

He also articulated his response to stubborn judges: “All right, in the future the Court can meet, but it will have no clerks. By the way, we aren’t going to pay the electric bill for two years. And since you seem to be rendering justice in the dark, you don’t seem to need your law libraries either.”

Mr. Gingrich’s inflammatory proposals to change the function of the judiciary advances governance based on political preferences and denies the role of an independent bench as part of the constitutional balance of America.

No, he’s not kidding!

Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang


5 thoughts on “Newt Gingrich Really Wants to Change Government Starting With Judiciary

  1. Poor Newt. He is faltering in the polls. His time in the sun has long been over. America and not even the far right Tea Party will not fall for this bait.

    He is way out on a ledge. There are other methods of working through the “challenges” of superior court decisions not meeting the expectations of the people. In the US, many judges are elected and even the Supremes enjoy a relatively short shelf life. With the likely election of a Republican president and Senate, things will naturally swing right of centre. One just needs to practice some patience. Got to give him credit for showmanship though!!!

  2. I love your blog, you should add an RSS feed feature so I can get automatic notifications of new blogs. If you set one up please email me! i will bookmark you for now. Again Excellent Blog!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s