Death Penalty Countries

Canada’s death penalty was discarded in 1976, some 34 years ago, but it was a slow journey to abolition. Up until 1961 all murders in Canada were punishable by hanging. It was only in 1954 that rape was eliminated as a death penalty offence. Every year between 1954 and 1963 a private member’s bill was introduced into Parliament calling for the abolition of the death penalty. Each year it failed.

The first major debate in the House of Commons was in 1966 when our lawmakers agreed to reserve the death penalty for murders involving police officers and prison guards. It took another ten years but on July 14, 1976 a free vote was held and capital punishment was repealed and a mandatory life sentence with no possibility of parole for 25 years was substituted. However, military tribunals remained able to invoke capital punishment for treason and mutiny. In December 1998 this last bastion of capital punishment was finally recinded.

There were 710 executions in Canada between 1867 and 1962, the last execution was on December 11, 1962 in Toronto, Ontario.

Canada is one of many countries that no longer utilize the death penalty, but despite world-wide pressure and the intervention of Amnesty International, the twenty-first century is still marked by this barbaric practice.

It is reported that 58 countries still include capital punishment in their criminal laws and over 60% of the world’s population lives in death penalty countries. The most notorious death penalty countries include China, who refuses to disclose statistics, but was estimated to have executed 5000 offenders in 2009. Iran comes next with at least 388 death penalty cases in 2009; Iraq with at least 120 state-ordered killings; Saudi Arabia at 69 and finally, the United States at 52 executions in 2009.

Some countries also employ the death penalty for drug-related offences including Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Brunei, Vietnam, Thailand, Pakistan and China.

In China, Congo, Iran, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and the United States, offenders who were juveniles at the time they committed their capital crime have been executed. Japan’s death row now houses three prisoners who committed their crimes while under the age of 20, which is the age of majority in Japan.

One of the most notorious juvenile death penalty cases occurred in Iran in 2005 where two boys age 14 and 16 at the time of their arrests, were executed for the rape of a 13 year-old boy, despite allegations that all three boys were engaged in consensual homosexual acts. Human rights groups throughout the world were outraged and some claimed that the boys were killed because they were gay and the rape allegation was a cover-up.

China still remains the worst offender of human rights. Recently, a proposed change in the death penalty laws has been the subject of heated debate. A committee of the National People’s Congress is discussing the removal of 13 crimes from the list of 68 crimes punishable by death, including crimes of grave robbery, panda smuggling, tax fraud, and theft of fossils. Critics, however, are not impressed because these offences rarely result in execution and other minor crimes remain on the capital penalty books including accepting bribes, making fake medicine and damaging public property.

As with all highly-charged moral and legal issues, the topic engenders fierce debate between those who are pro and con.

A review of commentary illustrates the tension between opposing camps:

“Capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders.” Albert Camus, French philosopher

“To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice.” Desmond Tutu, Activist and Cleric

“Capital punishment, Those without the capital get the punishment.” John Spinkelink, Executed in Florida, 1979

“I personally have always voted for the death penalty because I believe that people who go out prepared to take the lives of other people forfeit their own right to live…” Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

“I believe there are some crimes-mass murder, the rape and murder of a child, so heinous that the community is justified in expressing the full measure of its outrage by meting out the ultimate punishment.” Barack Obama, President of the United States

Lawdiva aka Georgialee Lang


8 thoughts on “Death Penalty Countries

  1. I’m not a lawyer, but I have a minor in philosophy, so I think I have insightful commentary.

    First off, Gandhi should have been quoted: “An eye for an eye makes the world blind.” which is a brilliant comment on a most intuitive and biblical foundation of criminal justice, and one that we owe to a very wise people, the Hebrews. Only Indian wisdom is comparable to that of the Jews.

    Albert Camus, I have studied briefly, and he is a flyweight in my view.

    Now about capital punishment, and claims about it being more about revenge than justice. I don’t think its possible to have a justice system without it having teeth when necessary.

    Some countries are better able to administer it. Totalitarian regimes like China and Iran are unqualified to handle it, but they have it anyway. In these cases, it is not justice, it’s just a tool of the state.

    But with the adversarial system we have in the West with its checks and balances, while not perfect is far more trustworthy than most other systems, and comparable to alternatives such as the French Napoleonic system. For those cases, such as those cited by President Obama, capital punishment does have its place in the continuum of remedies available to those charged with dispensing justice.

    There are some people who are too far gone, and whose continued existence represents an ongoing threat to the safety of those around them. Just as our immune system attacks cells that have gone cancerous before they can gain a foothold and take over, so too capital punishment has a role in keeping society healthy and functioning. The current system does not really remove sickness in society, it merely sequesters it away for a time, which to me seems weak, and unprecedented in terms of the biological metaphor I have used.

    1. Thank you for your well-reasoned comment. I do not disagree with your sentiments. With respect to the quotation you attribute to Gandhi, are you aware there is some controversy as to whether he actually said these words? Historians have been unable to identify any time or place he spoke these words. However, his family believes he did. Gandhi scholars say many philosophical expressions have been incorrectly attributed to Gandhi.

      I appreciate your contribution.

  2. The blog publisher features a specific ability to write on truly good topics. Reading the blog is pleasing and you obviously have many regular site visitors. No wonder, with the excellent articles. In any case, it was a pleasure to spend time on your blog and examine the interesting posts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s